The palace of Illusions : Chitra Banerjee Divakurni (4.0/5.0)

 

Life is too short to read mediocre books. I keep a high bar for books that I pick up. It's a fact of life that when one keeps a high bar one will reduce the Type 1 error but at the same time some Type 2 error will creep in. In English, that means that while one will hardly read any mediocre books there will always be some good books that will pass below the radar.

That is what happened with me when The Palace of Illusions first came out fifteen odd years back. I thought this one more new age mediocre pulp feminist takes on Mahabharat. When the book was selected as a reading for my book club I had no option but to pick it up. I stand corrected, the book is a unique and distinctly feminist take on the Mahabharat, but it's definitely not mediocre.

The book is largely a re-telling of Mahabharat from the point of view of Draupadi. The main attraction of the book is that it is another pretext to revisit the Mahabharat. I am convinced that Mahabharat is one of the top cultural heritages of this country. It is an amazingly complex and layered tale where nothing is what it seems - good people do evil deeds while the evil beguile gods with their penance. God himself encourages brother to kill brother for reducing the pressure of human beings on earth.With such brilliant source material its very difficult to go wrong - but not impossible. Chitra Divakaruni , who is a teacher of creative writing at a university in the United States, skirts this line by a good margin.

One of the main quirks of the book is that it is told from the point of view of Draupadi - but the Draupadi of this book seems like an alter ego of the 20th century Chitra Divakaruni. The author has also introduced a whole Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu thi vibe with the supposed tension between Kunti and Draupadi - again I don't know if this was  directly referenced in the original sources. Then there is Draupadi's obsession with Karn , which I think finds mention in several other sources as well. Despite , or maybe because of, these quirks the books remains true to Mahabharat and is a distinct well written book.

While speaking of Mahabharat I would also take the opportunity to mention 2 other takes on the book. Devadutt Patnaik's Jaya remains one of my favourite versions of the Mahabharat - its an erudite take on the book which combines various traditions and provides the authors own interpretation. Then there is Shashi Tharoor's Great Indian Novel  which makes a clever use of the Mahabharat to tell the story of Indian democracy.